In  the presentation session today, we delivered our three concept, content  and method of delivery boards along with our powerpoint presentation.  In the afternoon session, each group was designated a specific group to  recieve feedback from- our's being group 2 (which consisted of Beth  Yates, Charlie Crosby, Joe Warburton and Luke O'Brien- aka the God's of  graphic design...), this is the feedback we recieved...
-Enjoy  the idea- though not really communicating well as a lie, more of a  "con", and focusing too much on the commodity of the book. Didn't really  feel that the prank was a lie.
-Didn't  understand the transaction from poster pranks to fools- they liked the  poster idea, and felt that we should have ran with this. They liked the  simplistic, "anti-design", designed to camoflauge into every day,  mundande design and sigange.
-Thought the idea of the blog is effective- more ranges of media. Pranks itself could have been the media too.
-Pranks might have worked better as the "trying something new" brief.
-Ask more people to perform the pranks.
-Didn't understand the audience we were trying to target.
-Try outside of the class/college environment.
-Need to think more about the motives of our design.
Although  it may seem a little negative, I was actually really pleased with the  responses we got, and fully agreed with every point raised. I felt the  points were very constructive- some of which we had discussed, or faced  problems with in the past.
As  I have gone into more detail with from some of my blog posts, our group  faced a great deal of problems and indecisions along the way- many of  which we verbally highlighted in our presentation- that we felt the  poster pranks idea was hard to resolve/create an outcome from, and that  we felt the brief itself had proved very challenging.
If  time allowed, I would really like to take some of their tips and  perhaps go on to develop more designs- on a more expanded scale- perhaps  going out into the public and applying some of these posters more  liberally to gauge a response- however, as a group I am not sure that  everyone would be enthusiastic to expand this further. I will engage a  discussion and try to gain mementom once more, though if not, I will try  my best to possibly develop this further.
Although  we really did enjoy the poster prank stage of development, we found it  came to a lot of dead-ends and problems throughout the course of the  experimentations- so it's been really great to get another perspective  and encouragement to persue this and be assured that it was infact a  good idea, and that it has much more potential for development.
No comments:
Post a Comment